Talk:Seven-sided dice from five-sided dice: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Go PacMan.) |
(→J seems ugly: new section) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::As noted in the Tcl explanatory text, this is explicitly about making a primitive D5 and creating a D7 from it. (That's also why I use the terms D5 and D7; what programmer hasn't played at least ''some'' D&D? :-)) In any case, no conventional die (the correct singular form of “dice”) numbers from 0. —[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 10:04, 9 August 2009 (UTC) |
::As noted in the Tcl explanatory text, this is explicitly about making a primitive D5 and creating a D7 from it. (That's also why I use the terms D5 and D7; what programmer hasn't played at least ''some'' D&D? :-)) In any case, no conventional die (the correct singular form of “dice”) numbers from 0. —[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 10:04, 9 August 2009 (UTC) |
||
::I'm probably the exception that proves the rule about D&D. (My great time waster was PacMan)! --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 11:10, 9 August 2009 (UTC) |
::I'm probably the exception that proves the rule about D&D. (My great time waster was PacMan)! --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 11:10, 9 August 2009 (UTC) |
||
== J seems ugly == |
|||
I'd really like someone knowledgeable to look and make J solution more elegant. This straightforward solution doesn't look very good. |
Revision as of 17:44, 13 September 2009
It's more common for computer random number generators to generate a random number from 0 to n-1, than from 1 to n. So I propose changing the definitions of dice5() and dice7() to generate integers from 0..4 and 0..6, respectively. It will make the math a little simpler. --96.238.211.175 08:26, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
- Hi, please don't change this as it is more common for dice to count from 1. It is better to make the program adapt to the problem in this case. --Paddy3118 08:56, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
- As noted in the Tcl explanatory text, this is explicitly about making a primitive D5 and creating a D7 from it. (That's also why I use the terms D5 and D7; what programmer hasn't played at least some D&D? :-)) In any case, no conventional die (the correct singular form of “dice”) numbers from 0. —Donal Fellows 10:04, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
- I'm probably the exception that proves the rule about D&D. (My great time waster was PacMan)! --Paddy3118 11:10, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
J seems ugly
I'd really like someone knowledgeable to look and make J solution more elegant. This straightforward solution doesn't look very good.