Talk:Sequence: nth number with exactly n divisors: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Thundergnat (talk | contribs) m (true, but not the point I was making.) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
: That is one <strike>hel</strike> heck of some dandy hints!! -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 18:56, 11 April 2019 (UTC) |
: That is one <strike>hel</strike> heck of some dandy hints!! -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 18:56, 11 April 2019 (UTC) |
||
: May this is a naive question: Why 2nd term of sequence is not 2 but 3. 2 has exactly 2 divisors: 1 and 2 |
|||
(CalmoSoft) |
|||