Talk:Rock-paper-scissors: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 08:38, 11 April 2013

Ready to come out of draft? --Michael Mol 15:48, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

I like it. I haven't seen any questions. I think people understand RPS pretty well. +1 for promotion. --Mwn3d 16:02, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

RPS is pretty easy to understand. I was more concerned about the AI player. I have been thinking about Rock-Paper-Lizard-Spock. Particularly, having the same codebase be able to handle both forms of the game with minimal redundant code. That might be doable as an Extra Credit goal. --Michael Mol 16:11, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

That should be (above) rock-paper-scissors-lizard-Spock. -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 08:38, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 :I like it. I haven't seen any questions. I think people understand RPS pretty well. +1 for promotion. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 16:02, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 :: RPS is pretty easy to understand. I was more concerned about the AI player. I have been thinking about [[wp:rock-paper-scissors-lizard-Spock|Rock-Paper-Lizard-Spock]]. Particularly, having the same codebase be able to handle both forms of the game with minimal redundant code. That might be doable as an Extra Credit goal. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 16:11, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
+::: That should be (above) &nbsp; ''rock-paper-scissors-lizard-Spock''. &nbsp; -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 08:38, 11 April 2013 (UTC)