Talk:Reduced row echelon form: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Line 124: | Line 124: | ||
:: I haven't looked into it in detail, but adding an "if (div != 0)" line before the offending division seems to make it behave reasonably. |
:: I haven't looked into it in detail, but adding an "if (div != 0)" line before the offending division seems to make it behave reasonably. |
||
:: |
:: |
||
:: edit: looking into it, the lead-- line seems to deviate from the original algorithm, replacing that with a return |
:: edit: looking into it, the lead-- line seems to deviate from the original algorithm, replacing that with a "return matrix;" seems to fix it. |