Talk:Permutations with some identical elements: Difference between revisions
Talk:Permutations with some identical elements (view source)
Revision as of 11:59, 1 November 2022
, 1 year agoReply to "Close to the permutations task"
m (→task wording) |
(Reply to "Close to the permutations task") |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 40:
: Thanks a lot for your level-headed comments, Paddy. I was beginning to feel like a pair of brown shoes at a tuxedo party. I would go even further, it is best to ''never'' call other people liars, at least, not is such a public forum. I never thought anyone would go down that particular rabbit hole so quickly and use such spiteful and/or libelous language. One would think that adding whitespace to a task's preamble (and other forms of highlighting) was akin to leprosy or some such. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 22:19, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
:Point taken. For the record, I strongly prefer well established typography rules. [[User:Eoraptor|Eoraptor]] ([[User talk:Eoraptor|talk]]) 18:46, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
== Close to the permutations task ==
Line 46:
[[User:Eoraptor|Eoraptor]] ([[User talk:Eoraptor|talk]]) 06:12, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
:Thank you for mentioning this. It was just the hint I needed. :-)<br><br>I have put a description of the algorithm in the Quackery task solution. If you are able, please double check it. I have gone over it a dozen times but can't shake that nagging feeling that I might have got the "less than"s and "greater than"s muddled.<br>--[[User:GordonCharlton|GordonCharlton]] ([[User talk:GordonCharlton|talk]]) 11:58, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
| |||