Talk:Percolation/Site percolation: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→Tcl percolation?: Foolish is foolish) |
(→Tcl percolation?: ?) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::Why remove that feature Donal? Seeing a successful percolation is much more involving for the viewer than not. Also the other examples have that feature, making Tcl the odd one out? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 01:27, 9 September 2013 (UTC) |
::Why remove that feature Donal? Seeing a successful percolation is much more involving for the viewer than not. Also the other examples have that feature, making Tcl the odd one out? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 01:27, 9 September 2013 (UTC) |
||
::: Because it's a foolish requirement. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] ([[User talk:Dkf|talk]]) 09:44, 9 September 2013 (UTC) |
::: Because it's a foolish requirement. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] ([[User talk:Dkf|talk]]) 09:44, 9 September 2013 (UTC) |
||
::: I can't see the foolishness of the requirement to print a percolating example over printing an example which does not percolate. Would anyone else care to put their views as well as Donal? Thanks. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 15:38, 9 September 2013 (UTC) |