Talk:Penney's game: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→keeping score: That's OK too.) |
(→keeping score: P.S.) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:I meant only checking for the players sequence in the coin flips but what you state may be a popular extension. |
:I meant only checking for the players sequence in the coin flips but what you state may be a popular extension. |
||
:I tried to pitch the task for a less experienced coder, or someone with not much time. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 04:08, 28 September 2014 (UTC) |
:I tried to pitch the task for a less experienced coder, or someone with not much time. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 04:08, 28 September 2014 (UTC) |
||
:p.s. you only need output of two not six games.--[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 04:11, 28 September 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:11, 28 September 2014
keeping score
This Rosetta Code task (Penney's Game) states to keep score, which I interpreted as playing multiple games (or a better word would be innings; a game would therefore consist of several innings), and keeping a running tally of the number of wins. Am I interpreting "keeping score" correctly? I would think just saying that the human won or lost after just one inning isn't keeping score for the game (of the total number of wins). -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 20:02, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
- I meant only checking for the players sequence in the coin flips but what you state may be a popular extension.
- I tried to pitch the task for a less experienced coder, or someone with not much time. --Paddy3118 (talk) 04:08, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
- p.s. you only need output of two not six games.--Paddy3118 (talk) 04:11, 28 September 2014 (UTC)