Talk:Penney's game: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(→‎keeping score: That's OK too.)
Line 4: Line 4:
:I meant only checking for the players sequence in the coin flips but what you state may be a popular extension.
:I meant only checking for the players sequence in the coin flips but what you state may be a popular extension.
:I tried to pitch the task for a less experienced coder, or someone with not much time. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 04:08, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
:I tried to pitch the task for a less experienced coder, or someone with not much time. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 04:08, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
:p.s. you only need output of two not six games.--[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 04:11, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:11, 28 September 2014

keeping score

This Rosetta Code task (Penney's Game) states to keep score, which I interpreted as playing multiple games (or a better word would be innings;   a game would therefore consist of several innings),   and keeping a running tally of the number of wins.   Am I interpreting "keeping score" correctly?   I would think just saying that the human won or lost after just one inning isn't keeping score for the game (of the total number of wins). -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 20:02, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

I meant only checking for the players sequence in the coin flips but what you state may be a popular extension.
I tried to pitch the task for a less experienced coder, or someone with not much time. --Paddy3118 (talk) 04:08, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
p.s. you only need output of two not six games.--Paddy3118 (talk) 04:11, 28 September 2014 (UTC)