Talk:Pangram checker: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(proposed cleanup of ActionScript solution) |
(sure if it's correct) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
}</lang> |
}</lang> |
||
-- [[User:Markjreed|Markjreed]] 20:05, 2 August 2011 (UTC) |
-- [[User:Markjreed|Markjreed]] 20:05, 2 August 2011 (UTC) |
||
:Since the current implementation admits being barbaric, why not. --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] 20:16, 2 August 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:16, 2 August 2011
How about this for the same algorithm as the current ActionScript solution, but coded in a saner manner?
<lang ActionScript>function pangram(k:string):Boolean {
var lowerK:String = k.toLowerCase(); var has:Object = {} for (var i:Number=0; i<=k.length-1; i++) { has[lowerK.charAt(i)] = true; }
var result:Boolean = true;
for (var ch:String='a'; ch <= 'z'; ch=String.fromCharCode(ch.charCodeAt(0)+1)) { result = result && has[ch] }
return result || false;
}</lang> -- Markjreed 20:05, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
- Since the current implementation admits being barbaric, why not. --Ledrug 20:16, 2 August 2011 (UTC)