Talk:Next special primes: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→OK, I'm confused...: use br tags, not p) |
(→OK, I'm confused...: Always add a signature!!!) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<br> |
<br> |
||
BTW, I showed this to someone else and they suggested the answer was "2" because this is the smallest prime... |
BTW, I showed this to someone else and they suggested the answer was "2" because this is the smallest prime... |
||
<br>--[[User:Tigerofdarkness|Tigerofdarkness]] ([[User talk:Tigerofdarkness|talk]]) 19:44, 27 March 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 19:44, 27 March 2021
OK, I'm confused...
The task description is not very clear, what are the "successive terms" ?
My reading of the definition agrees with the Pascal output for "next increasing prime gap".
I can see why the sequence might be 3-5, 5-11, 11-19, etc. but I don't see why that is what the task requires.
Also, the Ring entry shows: 3-5, 11-19, 29-41, etc. i.e. 5-11 is not present.
Can anyone explain this?
BTW, I showed this to someone else and they suggested the answer was "2" because this is the smallest prime...
--Tigerofdarkness (talk) 19:44, 27 March 2021 (UTC)