Talk:Neighbour primes: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(Created page with "== Neighbor primes == This task should provide a clear definition of "neighbor primes". --~~~~")
 
 
Line 2: Line 2:


This task should provide a clear definition of "neighbor primes". --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 16:47, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
This task should provide a clear definition of "neighbor primes". --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 16:47, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

: RC tasks should provide a clear definition of that which they require. What an obvious idea, I wonder why no one has thought of it before. How about "Letting p be the ordered set of odd primes 3,5,..499 show all n (neighbour primes) such that p<sub>n</sub>*p<sub>n+1</sub>+2 is a member of the set of primes." There is also a draft task [[Special neighbor primes]] which is sort of related, has several entries. Should it be promoted? Should the be merged? These do not appear to be in OEIS perhaps we should add them.--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 18:05, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 18:06, 1 March 2023

Neighbor primes

This task should provide a clear definition of "neighbor primes". --Rdm (talk) 16:47, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

RC tasks should provide a clear definition of that which they require. What an obvious idea, I wonder why no one has thought of it before. How about "Letting p be the ordered set of odd primes 3,5,..499 show all n (neighbour primes) such that pn*pn+1+2 is a member of the set of primes." There is also a draft task Special neighbor primes which is sort of related, has several entries. Should it be promoted? Should the be merged? These do not appear to be in OEIS perhaps we should add them.--Nigel Galloway (talk) 18:05, 1 March 2023 (UTC)