Talk:Negative base numbers: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(added a talk section.)
 
(→‎possible extra credit option: added a new talk section.)
Line 1: Line 1:
==possible additional numbers to be used==
==possible additional numbers to be used==
Perhaps a negative number (such as   -15)   to base   -10,   and also zero  (to any negative base)   could/should be added to the numbers being converted to test the logic of the various programming entries.   -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 05:13, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Perhaps a negative number (such as   -15)   to base   -10,   and also zero  (to any negative base)   could/should be added to the numbers being converted to test the logic of the various programming entries.   -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 05:13, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

==possible extra credit option==
Since a few programming examples have shown the name of the language (being) used as a value   (possibly in base   -62),   why not add an extra credit to show the language name (as best as it can expressed)   for some   ''particular''   value?     (See the last example for the version 2 REXX entry.)   -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 07:46, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:46, 15 January 2017

possible additional numbers to be used

Perhaps a negative number (such as   -15)   to base   -10,   and also zero  (to any negative base)   could/should be added to the numbers being converted to test the logic of the various programming entries.   -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 05:13, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

possible extra credit option

Since a few programming examples have shown the name of the language (being) used as a value   (possibly in base   -62),   why not add an extra credit to show the language name (as best as it can expressed)   for some   particular   value?     (See the last example for the version 2 REXX entry.)   -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 07:46, 15 January 2017 (UTC)