Talk:Negative base numbers: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
(→possible extra credit option: added a note that the extra credit task requirement was added.) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:Good idea. Do you want to update the task description? --[[User:TimSC|TimSC]] ([[User talk:TimSC|talk]]) 08:23, 15 January 2017 (UTC) |
:Good idea. Do you want to update the task description? --[[User:TimSC|TimSC]] ([[User talk:TimSC|talk]]) 08:23, 15 January 2017 (UTC) |
||
:: It's your entry, but I'll add the extra credit thingy if you want. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 08:27, 15 January 2017 (UTC) |
|||
::: I've added the extra credit task requirement of showing the computer language's name to be expressed. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 22:27, 28 January 2017 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 22:27, 28 January 2017
possible additional numbers to be used
Perhaps a negative number (such as -15) to base -10, and also zero (to any negative base) could/should be added to the numbers being converted to test the logic of the various programming entries. -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 05:13, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
possible extra credit option
Since a few programming examples have shown the name of the language (being) used as a value (possibly in base -62), why not add an extra credit to show the language name (as best as it can expressed) for some particular value? (See the last example for the version 2 REXX entry.) -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 07:46, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
- It's your entry, but I'll add the extra credit thingy if you want. -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 08:27, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
- I've added the extra credit task requirement of showing the computer language's name to be expressed. -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 22:27, 28 January 2017 (UTC)