Talk:Mutual recursion: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(Created page with 'I didn't check all the methods, but a vast majority of them fail to take into account that n must be > 0. --Ronw 10:01, 20 November 2009 (PST)')
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
I didn't check all the methods, but a vast majority of them fail to take into account that n must be > 0. --[[User:Ronw|Ronw]] 10:01, 20 November 2009 (PST)
I didn't check all the methods, but a vast majority of them fail to take into account that n must be > 0. --[[User:Ronw|Ronw]] 10:01, 20 November 2009 (PST)
:The behavior is undefined for those cases. Error handling for it would just complicate things. I think it's OK to go without checking. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 18:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:03, 20 November 2009

I didn't check all the methods, but a vast majority of them fail to take into account that n must be > 0. --Ronw 10:01, 20 November 2009 (PST)

The behavior is undefined for those cases. Error handling for it would just complicate things. I think it's OK to go without checking. --Mwn3d 18:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)