Talk:Multifactorial: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→positive integers: Probably but ...) |
(added a comment.) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:It probably could be so extended, but I just wanted something that fit the mathworld and OEIS definition. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 01:47, 13 January 2013 (UTC) |
:It probably could be so extended, but I just wanted something that fit the mathworld and OEIS definition. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 01:47, 13 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
:: MathWorld, in fact, gives the wrong values when it referenced (quotes) the integer sequences from the OEIS values; it omits the first value (of the zero<sup>th</sup> entry) for each definition example. OEIS does, in fact, define all the multifactorial sequences as starting with zero. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) |
|||
Revision as of 09:09, 9 May 2016
positive integers
I would hope that the definition would be extended to all non-negative integers, not just the positive integers. -- Gerard Schildberger 00:29, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- It probably could be so extended, but I just wanted something that fit the mathworld and OEIS definition. --Paddy3118 01:47, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- MathWorld, in fact, gives the wrong values when it referenced (quotes) the integer sequences from the OEIS values; it omits the first value (of the zeroth entry) for each definition example. OEIS does, in fact, define all the multifactorial sequences as starting with zero. -- Gerard Schildberger (talk)