Talk:Montgomery reduction: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(No overlap with modular exponentiation) |
(→Draft: We're looking good) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:: I suggest that users not interleave comments. In the above text, I cannot know whether each word is by Dgamey, or by Mahaju. When replying to a comment, please write the reply below the comment, not in the middle of the comment. --[[User:Kernigh|Kernigh]] 00:40, 22 December 2011 (UTC) |
:: I suggest that users not interleave comments. In the above text, I cannot know whether each word is by Dgamey, or by Mahaju. When replying to a comment, please write the reply below the comment, not in the middle of the comment. --[[User:Kernigh|Kernigh]] 00:40, 22 December 2011 (UTC) |
||
: I've adjusted the page text so that the task is more clearly separated from the implementation of it; the key point is that we want the text to still work when there are many implementations in different languages. (For example, it's obvious that a particular language's implementation is in its own named section so you don't write that in the header material.) I've also made more use of <nowiki><math></nowiki> tags; the basic operations are mathematical after all. But don't worry that these changes were made; it takes practice to write perfect pages, and that you get by working at it and being helped by those who go before you. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 18:09, 22 December 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== No overlap with [[modular exponentiation]] == |
== No overlap with [[modular exponentiation]] == |
||