Talk:Minimum positive multiple in base 10 using only 0 and 1: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(added a talk section.)
 
(Replied to Gerard)
Line 1: Line 1:
== something's wrong ==
== something's wrong ==
In the task's preamble &nbsp; (in the '''E.G.''' section), &nbsp; the 4<sup>th</sup> multiplication &nbsp; (for a &nbsp; '''B10''' &nbsp; of &nbsp; '''111,111,111'''), &nbsp; the multiplier is incorrect. &nbsp; The multiplier shown would yield a &nbsp; '''B10''' &nbsp; value of &nbsp; '''1,111,111,101''', &nbsp; which isn't the minimum &nbsp; '''B10''' &nbsp; for a &nbsp; '''N''' &nbsp; of &nbsp; '''9'''. &nbsp; &nbsp; -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 18:57, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
In the task's preamble &nbsp; (in the '''E.G.''' section), &nbsp; the 4<sup>th</sup> multiplication &nbsp; (for a &nbsp; '''B10''' &nbsp; of &nbsp; '''111,111,111'''), &nbsp; the multiplier is incorrect. &nbsp; The multiplier shown would yield a &nbsp; '''B10''' &nbsp; value of &nbsp; '''1,111,111,101''', &nbsp; which isn't the minimum &nbsp; '''B10''' &nbsp; for a &nbsp; '''N''' &nbsp; of &nbsp; '''9'''. &nbsp; &nbsp; -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 18:57, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
:Hi Gerard, you multiply 'n' by the multiplier so 9 x 12,345,679 = 111,111,111 --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 19:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:20, 29 February 2020

something's wrong

In the task's preamble   (in the E.G. section),   the 4th multiplication   (for a   B10   of   111,111,111),   the multiplier is incorrect.   The multiplier shown would yield a   B10   value of   1,111,111,101,   which isn't the minimum   B10   for a   N   of   9.     -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 18:57, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi Gerard, you multiply 'n' by the multiplier so 9 x 12,345,679 = 111,111,111 --PureFox (talk) 19:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC)