Talk:Loops/While: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (added a new section. -- ~~~~) |
Walterpachl (talk | contribs) (→REXX: new section) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Print, and [''then''] divide. I can't see the interpretation of dividing and ''then'' printing. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 01:32, 30 March 2013 (UTC) |
Print, and [''then''] divide. I can't see the interpretation of dividing and ''then'' printing. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 01:32, 30 March 2013 (UTC) |
||
== REXX == |
|||
I am at a loss! |
|||
<br>Why was version 2 removed by Siskus?? |
|||
<br>We have now versions 1 3 and 4 |
|||
<br>I thought that thge extraneous version 1 was the bad joke (no loop whatsoever) |
|||
<br>I am leaving this battlefield. sorry --[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] ([[User talk:Walterpachl|talk]]) 20:47, 30 October 2013 (UTC)<math>Insert formula here</math> |
|||
Revision as of 20:47, 30 October 2013
Perhaps it should be specified that the number should be int or the number to count down to should be '1' rather than '0' The reason is that for languages that support the numbers rather than integers, the value only tends towards '0' never reaching it :)
task requirements
It seems the most simple tasks are so easily misunderstood.
Print, and [then] divide. I can't see the interpretation of dividing and then printing. -- Gerard Schildberger 01:32, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
REXX
I am at a loss!
Why was version 2 removed by Siskus??
We have now versions 1 3 and 4
I thought that thge extraneous version 1 was the bad joke (no loop whatsoever)
I am leaving this battlefield. sorry --Walterpachl (talk) 20:47, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
