Talk:Language Comparison Table: Difference between revisions
→Other considerations for language comparision tables
(→Esoteric languages: new section) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 183:
* If the language is interpreted, rather than compiled, can a [[hashbang]] mechanism be used at the top of the program to trigger an appropriate interpreter?
:Several points are related to library functions, not the language itself. Namely all about I/O, sound, graphics, terminal. The shebang mechanism is as OS question: for instance Mac OS 9 had a completely different mechanism to tell which command to use to open a given file (stored as a file property), and Windows uses the PATHEXT environment variable as well as the registry. [[User:Eoraptor|Eoraptor]] ([[User talk:Eoraptor|talk]]) 14:28, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
==Perl 6 - Strongly typed==
Line 205 ⟶ 206:
== Esoteric languages ==
I think esoteric languages should be added to this table, possibly in another section. --[[User:12Me21]]
: Wouldn't most of the column headings be irrelevant for most esoteric languages.? --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 23:40, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
| |||