Talk:Jensen's Device: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(http://news.php.net/php.internals/41374 PHP backslash...) |
m (typo.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It is amazing how wrong some ideas of early computing were. Fortunately none of modern languages really supports this mess. --[[User:Dmitry-kazakov|Dmitry-kazakov]] 11:53, 22 November 2008 (UTC) |
It is amazing how wrong some ideas of early computing were. Fortunately none of modern languages really supports this mess. --[[User:Dmitry-kazakov|Dmitry-kazakov]] 11:53, 22 November 2008 (UTC) |
||
I don't think the guys in the 1960's had a monopoly on bad ideas... take the new "\" (back slash) operator in PHP[http://news.php.net/php.internals/41374] as an example. Fortunately, every now and then, a good idea floats to the top, the trick |
I don't think the guys in the 1960's had a monopoly on bad ideas... take the new "\" (back slash) operator in PHP[http://news.php.net/php.internals/41374] as an example. Fortunately, every now and then, a good idea floats to the top, the trick is being able to spot the good idea early and rewind all the bad ideas even earlier. [[User:NevilleDNZ|NevilleDNZ]] 15:01, 22 November 2008 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 15:02, 22 November 2008
It is amazing how wrong some ideas of early computing were. Fortunately none of modern languages really supports this mess. --Dmitry-kazakov 11:53, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
I don't think the guys in the 1960's had a monopoly on bad ideas... take the new "\" (back slash) operator in PHP[1] as an example. Fortunately, every now and then, a good idea floats to the top, the trick is being able to spot the good idea early and rewind all the bad ideas even earlier. NevilleDNZ 15:01, 22 November 2008 (UTC)