Talk:Interactive programming (repl): Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(What is it suppoosed to do?) |
(propose rename to REPL) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I fail to see what concatenation of strings has to do with an interpreter and the latter with the language in which the task is to be implemented. I see a solution, but what was the task? --[[User:Dmitry-kazakov|Dmitry-kazakov]] 19:03, 21 February 2009 (UTC) |
I fail to see what concatenation of strings has to do with an interpreter and the latter with the language in which the task is to be implemented. I see a solution, but what was the task? --[[User:Dmitry-kazakov|Dmitry-kazakov]] 19:03, 21 February 2009 (UTC) |
||
Interactive execution does not imply the system is an ''interpreter''. I propose that this task be renamed to "REPL". --[[User:Kevin Reid|Kevin Reid]] 23:57, 21 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 23:57, 21 February 2009
Did I see some sort of "omit" template a while ago for tasks that are impossible in some languages? How do you use that? This task can't be done in a couple languages I know of. --Mwn3d 18:39, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
I fail to see what concatenation of strings has to do with an interpreter and the latter with the language in which the task is to be implemented. I see a solution, but what was the task? --Dmitry-kazakov 19:03, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Interactive execution does not imply the system is an interpreter. I propose that this task be renamed to "REPL". --Kevin Reid 23:57, 21 February 2009 (UTC)