Talk:Idiomatically determine all the characters that can be used for symbols: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Walterpachl (talk | contribs) (→ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): I consider Version 2 better than Version 1) |
Walterpachl (talk | contribs) m (→ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): typo and formatting) |
||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
:::::::: That the ooRexx is the next (or at least one of the next) evolution of Classic REXX, and is one major reason that ooRexx has it's own language section. One fact is that that first version (of Classic REXX) is executable with any and all Classic REXX interpreters (too many to list here), there are no exceptions that I know of --- nothing needs to be changes/modified for it to run. This is probably the main reason that the various object-oriented versions of other languages (in Rosetta Code) are in separate language sections, whether or not those o-o language versions could execute those non o-o versions. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 01:46, 17 September 2014 (UTC) |
:::::::: That the ooRexx is the next (or at least one of the next) evolution of Classic REXX, and is one major reason that ooRexx has it's own language section. One fact is that that first version (of Classic REXX) is executable with any and all Classic REXX interpreters (too many to list here), there are no exceptions that I know of --- nothing needs to be changes/modified for it to run. This is probably the main reason that the various object-oriented versions of other languages (in Rosetta Code) are in separate language sections, whether or not those o-o language versions could execute those non o-o versions. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 01:46, 17 September 2014 (UTC) |
||
::::::::: It is another fact (I think) that the second version of this program is executable with any and all Classic REXX interpreters '''AND''' ooRexx (which IS an interpreter for a subset of programs written in '''Classic''' Rexx). I don't care and can't argue about other oo-languages and sections. |
::::::::: It is another fact (I think) that the second version of this program is executable with any and all Classic REXX interpreters '''AND''' ooRexx (which IS an interpreter for a subset of programs written in '''Classic''' Rexx). I don't care and can't argue about other oo-languages and sections.<br>Please add short arguments of disagreement to statements that I listed in the arbitration section (thanks, Paddy) below. --[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] ([[User talk:Walterpachl|talk]]) 08:06, 17 September 2014 (UTC) |
||
Please add short arguments of disagreement to statements that I listed in the arbitration section (thanks, Paddy) above. --[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] ([[User talk:Walterpachl|talk]]) 08:06, 17 September 2014 (UTC) |
|||
<br> |
<br> |
||
<br>Actually I have documented all the differences I knew on July 2012: |
<br>Actually I have documented all the differences I knew on July 2012: |
||