Talk:Idiomatically determine all the characters that can be used for symbols: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Walterpachl (talk | contribs) (→ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): What is the REXX section for? LANGUAGE or IMPLEMENTATION?) |
(→ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): added a rebuttal.) |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
:::::: The venue for REXX programs is the REXX section. I don't think that duplicating REXX programs under ooRexx makes sense. The ooRexx section is the place to show (off) oo features where possible. The sections address LANGUAGES not IMPLEMENTATIONS.--[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] ([[User talk:Walterpachl|talk]]) 19:19, 13 September 2014 (UTC) |
:::::: The venue for REXX programs is the REXX section. I don't think that duplicating REXX programs under ooRexx makes sense. The ooRexx section is the place to show (off) oo features where possible. The sections address LANGUAGES not IMPLEMENTATIONS.--[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] ([[User talk:Walterpachl|talk]]) 19:19, 13 September 2014 (UTC) |
||
::::::: It seems to me that the your logic is circular. If a REXX program can be executed (and IS executed) under (or with) ooRexx, enter it in the ooREXX language section. The REXX section is for Classic REXX implementations; ooRexx is a different language AND implementation (as witnessed by many differences, notably numerous options/features/capabilities/etc, whether or not they are being used in any specific example) --- in any case, the output is different, so please show that difference in the ooRexx language section. This just seems like a justification in entering an ooRexx execution under the (Classic) REXX language section. If using an ooRexx interpreter, enter it under the ooRexx language section. That is the venue for ooRexx. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 19:33, 13 September 2014 (UTC) |
|||
----- |
----- |