Talk:Horner's rule for polynomial evaluation: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→Task format?: Ta!) |
(→J language and p.: Does p. use Horner's?) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
: I had a go at tidying things up. The trick is to use indentation and avoid <nowiki><br></nowiki>. I also made the pseudocode look more pseudocode-y; it might be better to rewrite it to use a '''for…downto''' loop though. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 09:13, 31 March 2010 (UTC) |
: I had a go at tidying things up. The trick is to use indentation and avoid <nowiki><br></nowiki>. I also made the pseudocode look more pseudocode-y; it might be better to rewrite it to use a '''for…downto''' loop though. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 09:13, 31 March 2010 (UTC) |
||
:: Thanks Donal. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 14:29, 31 March 2010 (UTC) |
:: Thanks Donal. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 14:29, 31 March 2010 (UTC) |
||
==J language and p.== |
|||
Just wondered, does p. use Horner's rule? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 03:11, 1 April 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 03:11, 1 April 2010
Task format?
I don't particularly like the layout of the equations in the task description just yet. Although i have tried to cut down on the amount of equations, I needed some, but they don't seem to flow with the text around them very well. --Paddy3118 06:28, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
- I had a go at tidying things up. The trick is to use indentation and avoid <br>. I also made the pseudocode look more pseudocode-y; it might be better to rewrite it to use a for…downto loop though. –Donal Fellows 09:13, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks Donal. --Paddy3118 14:29, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
J language and p.
Just wondered, does p. use Horner's rule? --Paddy3118 03:11, 1 April 2010 (UTC)