Talk:Hello world/Standard error: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
 
Line 1: Line 1:
== REXX sterr vs. stdout ==

I tried to but couldn't convince the author of Rexx versions 1 to 3 that these, in my view, do not address the task at hand. The two Rexx implementations that I know (ooRexx and Regina) allow to send error messages to the stderr stream which is also used for Trace output and error messages. I do not know of any other Rexx that would support this feature that allows you to redirect output to separate files for the two streams stdout (used by Say) and stderr. --[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] ([[User talk:Walterpachl|talk]]) 10:57, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

== REXX sterr vs. stdout ==
== REXX sterr vs. stdout ==



Revision as of 10:57, 11 July 2014

REXX sterr vs. stdout

I tried to but couldn't convince the author of Rexx versions 1 to 3 that these, in my view, do not address the task at hand. The two Rexx implementations that I know (ooRexx and Regina) allow to send error messages to the stderr stream which is also used for Trace output and error messages. I do not know of any other Rexx that would support this feature that allows you to redirect output to separate files for the two streams stdout (used by Say) and stderr. --Walterpachl (talk) 10:57, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

REXX sterr vs. stdout

I tried to but couldn't convince the author of Rexx versions 1 to 3 that these, in my view, do not address the task at hand. The two Rexx implementations that I know (ooRexx and Regina) allow to send error messages to the stderr stream which is also used for Trace output and error messages. I do not know of any other Rexx that would support this feature that allows you to redirect output to separate files for the two streams stdout (used by Say) and stderr. --Walterpachl (talk) 10:57, 11 July 2014 (UTC)