Talk:Get system command output: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:IMHO it makes more sense to add storing the output as an option/extra credit to [[Execute a system command]]. --[[User:AndiPersti|Andreas Perstinger]] ([[User talk:AndiPersti|talk]]) 10:43, 11 April 2014 (UTC) |
:IMHO it makes more sense to add storing the output as an option/extra credit to [[Execute a system command]]. --[[User:AndiPersti|Andreas Perstinger]] ([[User talk:AndiPersti|talk]]) 10:43, 11 April 2014 (UTC) |
||
::That might have been better had we thought of it when "Execute a system command" was still a draft task but it has over a hundred entries making any task update unfair to the existing entries. |
|||
::I think the choice should be "do we delete this as being too similar or not". --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 10:58, 11 April 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 10:58, 11 April 2014
Do we need this task when we have Execute a system command?
Do we? --Paddy3118 (talk) 07:39, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- IMHO it makes more sense to add storing the output as an option/extra credit to Execute a system command. --Andreas Perstinger (talk) 10:43, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- That might have been better had we thought of it when "Execute a system command" was still a draft task but it has over a hundred entries making any task update unfair to the existing entries.
- I think the choice should be "do we delete this as being too similar or not". --Paddy3118 (talk) 10:58, 11 April 2014 (UTC)