Talk:Gamma function: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(Hmm)
(Complex field?)
Line 3: Line 3:


: Hmm, I never saw this form in mathematical literature. Technically, there is no any multiplication of ''f(x)'' by ''dx''. You cannot commute them, if you meant that. And integral operator is not equal to definite integral. The definite integral using the integral operator would be sort of: <math>{\int f}\mid_a^b</math>. --[[User:Dmitry-kazakov|Dmitry-kazakov]] 20:55, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
: Hmm, I never saw this form in mathematical literature. Technically, there is no any multiplication of ''f(x)'' by ''dx''. You cannot commute them, if you meant that. And integral operator is not equal to definite integral. The definite integral using the integral operator would be sort of: <math>{\int f}\mid_a^b</math>. --[[User:Dmitry-kazakov|Dmitry-kazakov]] 20:55, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

==Complex field==
Actually Gamma is defined on complex numbers. Is the task about its real part only? --[[User:Dmitry-kazakov|Dmitry-kazakov]] 22:25, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:25, 5 March 2009

Integrals

I prefer the form (operator-like) instead of the form ; both are correct; no need to change it the next time:D --ShinTakezou 20:01, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Hmm, I never saw this form in mathematical literature. Technically, there is no any multiplication of f(x) by dx. You cannot commute them, if you meant that. And integral operator is not equal to definite integral. The definite integral using the integral operator would be sort of: . --Dmitry-kazakov 20:55, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Complex field

Actually Gamma is defined on complex numbers. Is the task about its real part only? --Dmitry-kazakov 22:25, 5 March 2009 (UTC)