Talk:Fractran: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(I wouldn't bother) |
(→"natural format"?: new section) |
||
Line 1:
Should we create a category for this programming language? Might be interesting.--[[User:Grondilu|Grondilu]] ([[User talk:Grondilu|talk]]) 21:33, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
: Theoretically yes. Practically, probably not; writing Hello World in it would be prohibitively difficult (how to do meaningful I/O?) so the set of tasks it could do would be a bit too small. We can make the category when someone starts doing the tasks, not before. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] ([[User talk:Dkf|talk]]) 21:54, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
== "natural format"? ==
Why does the task have to tack on a text parsing requirement? It's irrelevant to the fraction Turing machine, and simply distracting. Why not let people focus on the important stuff? --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] ([[User talk:Ledrug|talk]]) 17:19, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
|
Revision as of 17:19, 23 January 2014
Should we create a category for this programming language? Might be interesting.--Grondilu (talk) 21:33, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
- Theoretically yes. Practically, probably not; writing Hello World in it would be prohibitively difficult (how to do meaningful I/O?) so the set of tasks it could do would be a bit too small. We can make the category when someone starts doing the tasks, not before. –Donal Fellows (talk) 21:54, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
"natural format"?
Why does the task have to tack on a text parsing requirement? It's irrelevant to the fraction Turing machine, and simply distracting. Why not let people focus on the important stuff? --Ledrug (talk) 17:19, 23 January 2014 (UTC)