Talk:First power of 2 that has leading decimal digits of 12: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (added some words.) |
(Further comment.) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:: I was just about to add the (home page) information. I had originally phrased the problem much differently, but then it seemed to be more confusing and somewhat unclear, so I went with the original wording and phrasing that someone had paraphrased. I tried to find the problem on that website, but I couldn't find (I must have mis-remembered some keyword/keywords because I couldn't locate it via my search engine, other than it was on that site. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 23:29, 15 January 2020 (UTC) |
:: I was just about to add the (home page) information. I had originally phrased the problem much differently, but then it seemed to be more confusing and somewhat unclear, so I went with the original wording and phrasing that someone had paraphrased. I tried to find the problem on that website, but I couldn't find (I must have mis-remembered some keyword/keywords because I couldn't locate it via my search engine, other than it was on that site. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 23:29, 15 January 2020 (UTC) |
||
::: I wonder what the significance is of saying that: "You are also given that p(123,45)=12710."? It's not as if it's going to take a long time to calculate whatever method is used. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 23:49, 15 January 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:49, 15 January 2020
License check
We seem to be following the license from the original site, (although I couldn't find the problem number to add a link).
- Note: I am not the uthor of thie task, just checking the license. --Paddy3118 (talk) 22:51, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- I've found the problem number which is 686. --PureFox (talk) 23:21, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- I was just about to add the (home page) information. I had originally phrased the problem much differently, but then it seemed to be more confusing and somewhat unclear, so I went with the original wording and phrasing that someone had paraphrased. I tried to find the problem on that website, but I couldn't find (I must have mis-remembered some keyword/keywords because I couldn't locate it via my search engine, other than it was on that site. -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 23:29, 15 January 2020 (UTC)