Talk:First perfect square in base n with n unique digits: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(Perhaps the 'First perfect square in base 2 with 2 unique digits' is arguably '01' ?)
 
(→‎Leading zeros ?: Reworded.)
Line 3: Line 3:
Perhaps the 'First perfect square in base 2 with 2 unique digits' is arguably '01' ?
Perhaps the 'First perfect square in base 2 with 2 unique digits' is arguably '01' ?
[[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 23:53, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
[[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 23:53, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

: Ok, kind of weaselly but fair point. Reworded; First perfect square in base 2 with 2 '''significant''' unique digits. --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 01:17, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:18, 21 May 2019

Leading zeros ?

Perhaps the 'First perfect square in base 2 with 2 unique digits' is arguably '01' ? Hout (talk) 23:53, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Ok, kind of weaselly but fair point. Reworded; First perfect square in base 2 with 2 significant unique digits. --Thundergnat (talk) 01:17, 21 May 2019 (UTC)