Talk:Doubly-linked list/Definition: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 18:17, 13 January 2009

Some languages provide pre-defined libraries for doubly-linked lists. Do you want to allow use of those libraries? --Waldorf 21:44, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

I would say showing implementation would be more interesting than simply using "vectors", "lists" or whatever else the language/built in libs have. Nonetheless, as it happened in another task, this site is about showing common (?) way to do things in a language, not implementing libraries... So if a (standard and widespread) libs/way exist in a language, I believe it should be used. Am I right? ... In C, there's no such a standard library (or I don't know it...), so I implemented the code. --ShinTakezou 18:17, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

About C

I wrote this code for another task, but it was not suitable for it. Then I discovered it is suitable for this one; but I did not test it deeply. --ShinTakezou 18:17, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Some languages provide pre-defined libraries for doubly-linked lists. Do you want to allow use of those libraries? --[[User:Waldorf|Waldorf]] 21:44, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
+: I would say showing implementation would be more interesting than simply using "vectors", "lists" or whatever else the language/built in libs have. Nonetheless, as it happened in another task, this site is about showing common (?) way to do things in a language, not implementing libraries... So if a (standard and widespread) libs/way exist in a language, I believe it should be used. Am I right? ... In C, there's no such a standard library (or I don't know it...), so I implemented the code. --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 18:17, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
+===About C===
+I wrote this code for another task, but it was not suitable for it. Then I discovered it is suitable for this one; but I did not test it deeply. --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 18:17, 13 January 2009 (UTC)