Talk:Discordian date: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(Agreed. Cleanup needed, and in more than just this task.)
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:


Thus, at present, this task is underspecified.
Thus, at present, this task is underspecified.

:Actually it's a bit different in that it lacks months and instead splits the year into five seasons of 73 days each, St. Tib's intentionally being the odd one out and complicating a numerical sequential representation. It's linked to the Gregorian date apart from that, though (i.e. New Year's Day is identical, the number of days in a year is identical and the year has a static offset).
:The naming isn't particularly important, though there's a convention to use them instead of representing the seasons by their ordinals.
:I agree that the task description is incomplete, though. It'd probably be a good idea to at least specify the expected format ("$season $d, YOLD $yyyy"). --- [[Special:Contributions/78.35.107.83|78.35.107.83]] 16:40, 27 July 2010 (UTC)


--[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 14:52, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
--[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 14:52, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:40, 27 July 2010

According to the wiki page, the Disscordian calendar corresponds exactly to the Gregorian calendar (with some contrarian disputes about corresponding to the Julian calendar). The significant difference is in naming.

It would be good for the task itself to specify the naming required, rather than requiring us to extract them from that wiki page.

But, also, if dates are represented numerically, the identity function is sufficient to convert a gregorian date to a discordian date, except that the year needs to be adjusted.

Thus, at present, this task is underspecified.

Actually it's a bit different in that it lacks months and instead splits the year into five seasons of 73 days each, St. Tib's intentionally being the odd one out and complicating a numerical sequential representation. It's linked to the Gregorian date apart from that, though (i.e. New Year's Day is identical, the number of days in a year is identical and the year has a static offset).
The naming isn't particularly important, though there's a convention to use them instead of representing the seasons by their ordinals.
I agree that the task description is incomplete, though. It'd probably be a good idea to at least specify the expected format ("$season $d, YOLD $yyyy"). --- 78.35.107.83 16:40, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

--Rdm 14:52, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

I agree that simply linking over to a WP for even basic details makes for a bad description. Would someone create a template for marking such tasks, and then find and tag the tasks that do that? If the tagging is done first, more people can concurrently assist with actual cleanup. --Michael Mol 17:17, 22 July 2010 (UTC)