Talk:Cycle detection: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→output) |
(added a new talk section.) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Printing the cycle would make it easier to test and visualize the results. |
Printing the cycle would make it easier to test and visualize the results. |
||
--[[User:Paul.chernoch|Paul.chernoch]] ([[User talk:Paul.chernoch|talk]]) 18:58, 26 February 2016 (UTC) |
--[[User:Paul.chernoch|Paul.chernoch]] ([[User talk:Paul.chernoch|talk]]) 18:58, 26 February 2016 (UTC) |
||
==task requirement== |
|||
I've noticed that some entries don't use the Brent algorithm in finding a solution. |
|||
Is it an intent that the solutions ''must'' use the Brent algorithm? -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 22:07, 26 February 2016 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 22:07, 26 February 2016
output
Wouldn't it be sufficient just to print the cycle? Fwend (talk) 14:23, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Not a bad idea. My choice of output was influenced by the needs of an algorithm that uses Cycle detection as a subroutine. Printing the cycle would make it easier to test and visualize the results. --Paul.chernoch (talk) 18:58, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
task requirement
I've noticed that some entries don't use the Brent algorithm in finding a solution.
Is it an intent that the solutions must use the Brent algorithm? -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 22:07, 26 February 2016 (UTC)