Talk:Count in octal: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Dupe?) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Now that I think about it, I think this task is covered by [[Non-decimal radices/Output]]. I know there's no "loop forever" in that task, but I think it covers the meat of this task (and more). Thoughts? --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 03:47, 6 June 2011 (UTC) |
Now that I think about it, I think this task is covered by [[Non-decimal radices/Output]]. I know there's no "loop forever" in that task, but I think it covers the meat of this task (and more). Thoughts? --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 03:47, 6 June 2011 (UTC) |
||
: Hmm... Seems like it. The "loop over every integer" bit isn't completely trivial, but yeah, it's probably not enough to differentiate this. [[User:MagiMaster|MagiMaster]] 03:50, 6 June 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 03:50, 6 June 2011
Dupe?
Now that I think about it, I think this task is covered by Non-decimal radices/Output. I know there's no "loop forever" in that task, but I think it covers the meat of this task (and more). Thoughts? --Mwn3d 03:47, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- Hmm... Seems like it. The "loop over every integer" bit isn't completely trivial, but yeah, it's probably not enough to differentiate this. MagiMaster 03:50, 6 June 2011 (UTC)