Talk:Comments: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (→[[C]]: #if 0 and syntax errors: forgot to login) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
:::Any reference should be linked. As long as it's relevant to the project, language or code used. Even though we provide a lot of code in Rosetta Code, sometimes this isn't enough. I don't see why we shouldn't allow anyone to read more on a given subject. This is of course true for this issue, but it also is for any other. --[[User:CrashandDie|CrashandDie]] 01:11, 5 October 2007 (MDT) |
:::Any reference should be linked. As long as it's relevant to the project, language or code used. Even though we provide a lot of code in Rosetta Code, sometimes this isn't enough. I don't see why we shouldn't allow anyone to read more on a given subject. This is of course true for this issue, but it also is for any other. --[[User:CrashandDie|CrashandDie]] 01:11, 5 October 2007 (MDT) |
||
== [[Python]]: move docstrings to its own task == |
|||
Python docstrings are not comments and are not ignored by the compiler/interpreter. Strings in the source are also not ignored - they are probably crated and destroyed at runtime, and are not the way to comment code. |
|||
We can add the Pythonic way to comment code: |
|||
<pre> |
|||
if 0: |
|||
print 'this line is commented out' |
|||
print 'so is this line' |
|||
</pre> |
|||