Talk:Collatz conjecture: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(do whatever) |
(Retire this task?) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::Please go ahead with whatever you think is best, even including replacing this with a redirect and merging the programs. I don't have the time/enthusiasm to review this myself now. —[[User:Kevin Reid|Kevin Reid]] 14:40, 8 March 2010 (UTC) |
::Please go ahead with whatever you think is best, even including replacing this with a redirect and merging the programs. I don't have the time/enthusiasm to review this myself now. —[[User:Kevin Reid|Kevin Reid]] 14:40, 8 March 2010 (UTC) |
||
== Retire this task? == |
|||
Should this task be removed in favour of [[Hailstone sequence]] which I have tried to make a better Rosetta Code task,(and which might still serve a s a a useful link from the wikipedia [[wp:Collatz conjecture|article]])? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 13:44, 9 March 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 13:44, 9 March 2010
These programs were copied here from the Wikipedia article on the Collatz conjecture, where they were less on-topic and some felt they should be removed. See wp:Talk:Collatz conjecture#Removal of program languages. —Kevin Reid 19:16, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
- I had intended to do a task on this soon but you beat me to it. I have still gone ahead with Hailstone sequence though as it is more of a 'proper' task. What do you think. --Paddy3118 00:09, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
- Please go ahead with whatever you think is best, even including replacing this with a redirect and merging the programs. I don't have the time/enthusiasm to review this myself now. —Kevin Reid 14:40, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Retire this task?
Should this task be removed in favour of Hailstone sequence which I have tried to make a better Rosetta Code task,(and which might still serve a s a a useful link from the wikipedia article)? --Paddy3118 13:44, 9 March 2010 (UTC)