Talk:Collatz conjecture: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(do whatever)
Line 2: Line 2:


:I had intended to do a task on this soon but you beat me to it. I have still gone ahead with [[Hailstone sequence]] though as it is more of a 'proper' task. What do you think. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 00:09, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
:I had intended to do a task on this soon but you beat me to it. I have still gone ahead with [[Hailstone sequence]] though as it is more of a 'proper' task. What do you think. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 00:09, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

::Please go ahead with whatever you think is best, even including replacing this with a redirect and merging the programs. I don't have the time/enthusiasm to review this myself now. —[[User:Kevin Reid|Kevin Reid]] 14:40, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:40, 8 March 2010

These programs were copied here from the Wikipedia article on the Collatz conjecture, where they were less on-topic and some felt they should be removed. See wp:Talk:Collatz conjecture#Removal of program languages. —Kevin Reid 19:16, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

I had intended to do a task on this soon but you beat me to it. I have still gone ahead with Hailstone sequence though as it is more of a 'proper' task. What do you think. --Paddy3118 00:09, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Please go ahead with whatever you think is best, even including replacing this with a redirect and merging the programs. I don't have the time/enthusiasm to review this myself now. —Kevin Reid 14:40, 8 March 2010 (UTC)