Talk:Classes: Difference between revisions
(→Classes as Objects: new section) |
(→The point of the C code?: new section) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Some object systems have classes as being entities in the object system: there's a class of classes. Others do not. Is this worth mentioning here (possibly with a link to a task to show what's going on)? (Also, some of the object systems that have a class of classes also allow subclassing of that class...) —[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 09:12, 3 September 2009 (UTC) |
Some object systems have classes as being entities in the object system: there's a class of classes. Others do not. Is this worth mentioning here (possibly with a link to a task to show what's going on)? (Also, some of the object systems that have a class of classes also allow subclassing of that class...) —[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 09:12, 3 September 2009 (UTC) |
||
== The point of the C code? == |
|||
Isn't the C sample here a bit useless? After all this work, one ends up with a blob of data, a few functions intended to operator on said data, a lot of ugly long identifiers but no way to do inheritance or polymorphism, because nothing is provided for method dispatching base on type or object. Where's the OO in this? --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] 22:00, 19 June 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 22:00, 19 June 2011
The task here is not specific enough. The task should an object that does something very simple, for example, a person which has a first name and last name and a method to return full name or a shape returning its area, etc.
- I think it still works. Adding comments is simple enough for explanation. --Mwn3d 16:45, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Destructor
What do you guys think about adding a destructor requirement where appropriate? --Mwn3d 16:45, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- I think it's a good idea to show, but not worth putting as a requirement. —Donal Fellows 09:09, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Classes as Objects
Some object systems have classes as being entities in the object system: there's a class of classes. Others do not. Is this worth mentioning here (possibly with a link to a task to show what's going on)? (Also, some of the object systems that have a class of classes also allow subclassing of that class...) —Donal Fellows 09:12, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
The point of the C code?
Isn't the C sample here a bit useless? After all this work, one ends up with a blob of data, a few functions intended to operator on said data, a lot of ugly long identifiers but no way to do inheritance or polymorphism, because nothing is provided for method dispatching base on type or object. Where's the OO in this? --Ledrug 22:00, 19 June 2011 (UTC)