Talk:Classes: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(→‎Destructor: Not thrilling over this...)
(→‎Classes as Objects: new section)
Line 5: Line 5:
What do you guys think about adding a destructor requirement where appropriate? --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 16:45, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
What do you guys think about adding a destructor requirement where appropriate? --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 16:45, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
: I think it's a good idea to show, but not worth putting as a requirement. —[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 09:09, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
: I think it's a good idea to show, but not worth putting as a requirement. —[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 09:09, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

== Classes as Objects ==

Some object systems have classes as being entities in the object system: there's a class of classes. Others do not. Is this worth mentioning here (possibly with a link to a task to show what's going on)? (Also, some of the object systems that have a class of classes also allow subclassing of that class...) —[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 09:12, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:12, 3 September 2009

The task here is not specific enough. The task should an object that does something very simple, for example, a person which has a first name and last name and a method to return full name or a shape returning its area, etc.

I think it still works. Adding comments is simple enough for explanation. --Mwn3d 16:45, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Destructor

What do you guys think about adding a destructor requirement where appropriate? --Mwn3d 16:45, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

I think it's a good idea to show, but not worth putting as a requirement. —Donal Fellows 09:09, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Classes as Objects

Some object systems have classes as being entities in the object system: there's a class of classes. Others do not. Is this worth mentioning here (possibly with a link to a task to show what's going on)? (Also, some of the object systems that have a class of classes also allow subclassing of that class...) —Donal Fellows 09:12, 3 September 2009 (UTC)