Talk:Church numerals: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→Talk: Nice variant !) |
GordonBGood (talk | contribs) (→Created a stub for a Church Numerals: added several language variants...) |
||
Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
: Note that alternate implementations are suggested for those languages that don't have Haskell's full set of built-in functions and functional concepts.--[[User:GordonBGood|GordonBGood]] ([[User talk:GordonBGood|talk]]) 03:18, 30 December 2021 (UTC) |
: Note that alternate implementations are suggested for those languages that don't have Haskell's full set of built-in functions and functional concepts.--[[User:GordonBGood|GordonBGood]] ([[User talk:GordonBGood|talk]]) 03:18, 30 December 2021 (UTC) |
||
:: Nice variant ! Do add it to the main page. Late in the day, and really no need, I think, to start expanding requirements, but also no reason at all for individual contributions not to go an extra mile, as you have done so interestingly here. Many thanks ! [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 09:25, 30 December 2021 (UTC) |
:: Nice variant ! Do add it to the main page. Late in the day, and really no need, I think, to start expanding requirements, but also no reason at all for individual contributions not to go an extra mile, as you have done so interestingly here. Many thanks ! [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 09:25, 30 December 2021 (UTC) |
||
::: @Hout, I have contributed two different Haskell variants implementing the extended Church functions as well as C#, F#, and Nim equivalents for your perusal.--[[User:GordonBGood|GordonBGood]] ([[User talk:GordonBGood|talk]]) 13:01, 1 January 2022 (UTC) |
|||
===Worker-wrapper transformation in Haskell=== |
===Worker-wrapper transformation in Haskell=== |