Talk:Chowla numbers: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
: It might be worse; Mathematicians and Physicists argue/joke about which is the better from before programmers bickered over Vi vs Emacs. (Vim of course). |
: It might be worse; Mathematicians and Physicists argue/joke about which is the better from before programmers bickered over Vi vs Emacs. (Vim of course). |
||
: Omitting the quote might make for a better task as it is not clear what it adds. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 17:35, 11 March 2019 (UTC) |
: Omitting the quote might make for a better task as it is not clear what it adds. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 17:35, 11 March 2019 (UTC) |
||
==Large computations== |
|||
To get more language examples doing the task you might want to split the task goals into two: |
|||
# A base set that most languages can accomplish. |
|||
# Extended limits that are easily do-able by, say, most compiled languages in tens of minutes? |
|||
Slow languages might then all halt at the same subset, but show all the types of answer asked for, but for lower counts. |
|||
<br>Just a thought... --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 18:46, 11 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||