Talk:Case-sensitivity of identifiers: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary
(Another name nominee)
Line 5: Line 5:
: “''Variable '''name''' case sensitivity''” is probably better still. (Mind you, hardly anyone uses case insensitive variable ''contents'' any more; some ideas are better off dying.) –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 09:44, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
: “''Variable '''name''' case sensitivity''” is probably better still. (Mind you, hardly anyone uses case insensitive variable ''contents'' any more; some ideas are better off dying.) –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 09:44, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
:: Yes... for better or worse, case insensitivity under unicode can be nightmarish (as can be just about anything else that wants to treat characters abstractly and consistently). --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 15:57, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
:: Yes... for better or worse, case insensitivity under unicode can be nightmarish (as can be just about anything else that wants to treat characters abstractly and consistently). --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 15:57, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
:I nominate "Variable identifier case sensitivity". We can of course have redirects from other candidates. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 20:13, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:13, 7 February 2011

  • The task description needs to state what is needed to complete the task.
  • Maybe a more descriptive title? Something like "Variable case sensitivity"?

--Paddy3118 06:03, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Variable name case sensitivity” is probably better still. (Mind you, hardly anyone uses case insensitive variable contents any more; some ideas are better off dying.) –Donal Fellows 09:44, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Yes... for better or worse, case insensitivity under unicode can be nightmarish (as can be just about anything else that wants to treat characters abstractly and consistently). --Rdm 15:57, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
I nominate "Variable identifier case sensitivity". We can of course have redirects from other candidates. --Mwn3d 20:13, 7 February 2011 (UTC)