Talk:Carmichael 3 strong pseudoprimes: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→listing in ascending order: added a comment about perusing. -- ~~~~) |
(→listing in ascending order: added a tidbit about Carmichael numbers being odd. -- ~~~~) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==clarification of Carmichael 3 strong pseudomprimes== |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
One small tidbit. Carmichael numbers can't be even, so '''Prime1''' could be described as any '''odd''' prime ... |
|||
This would make some programs a wee bit faster starting at 3 instead of 2. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 06:58, 11 December 2012 (UTC) |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
I was thinking about listing the triplets in ascending order. |
I was thinking about listing the triplets in ascending order. |
||
Revision as of 06:58, 11 December 2012
clarification of Carmichael 3 strong pseudomprimes
One small tidbit. Carmichael numbers can't be even, so Prime1 could be described as any odd prime ...
This would make some programs a wee bit faster starting at 3 instead of 2. -- Gerard Schildberger 06:58, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
listing in ascending order
I was thinking about listing the triplets in ascending order. It would be a nice feature when showing the results. -- Gerard Schildberger 22:07, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
Implemented. It does make the reading of the Carmichael numbers much easier to peruse. -- Gerard Schildberger 06:47, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
Python issues?
Having had two languages base their entries on the Python but mention with changes I thought I should ask what it is I have done wrong. (I'm braced, go ahead...)
--Paddy3118 06:02, 11 December 2012 (UTC)