Talk:Carmichael 3 strong pseudoprimes: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
(Firefox happens to be in the minority in respect of how it handles formulae)
(perhaps an explanatory note to the reader ?)
Line 7: Line 7:


:: Yes, Firefox happens to be in the minority in respect of how it handles formulae (local processing of MathML, where requisite fonts are available) – most browsers currently take the route of displaying the graphic file). Support for the MathML route is at about 25%, and excludes Chrome, IE/Draft, and Safari. [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 10:49, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
:: Yes, Firefox happens to be in the minority in respect of how it handles formulae (local processing of MathML, where requisite fonts are available) – most browsers currently take the route of displaying the graphic file). Support for the MathML route is at about 25%, and excludes Chrome, IE/Draft, and Safari. [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 10:49, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
:: If it looks hard to get your formula to display in the majority of browsers, perhaps an explanatory to the reader ? [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 10:49, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
:: If it looks hard to get your formula to display in the majority of browsers, perhaps an explanatory note to the reader ? [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 10:49, 25 September 2016 (UTC)


==clarification of Carmichael 3 strong pseudomprimes==
==clarification of Carmichael 3 strong pseudomprimes==