Talk:Cantor set: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1:
Perhaps a pity that this task looks a bit neglected and incompletely defined ?
I wonder if it would be worth fleshing it out, and perhaps aiming for two complementary representations of N steps of the elaboration of the ternary Cantor set – perhaps for example:
# Each line as a list of intervals, expressed as fractions, and
# some graphic representation of the same
e.g. where N = 4, perhaps something like
<pre>[0, 1]
|
Latest revision as of 19:19, 6 November 2018
Perhaps a pity that this task looks a bit neglected and incompletely defined ?
I wonder if it would be worth fleshing it out, and perhaps aiming for two complementary representations of N steps of the elaboration of the ternary Cantor set – perhaps for example:
- Each line as a list of intervals, expressed as fractions, and
- some graphic representation of the same
e.g. where N = 4, perhaps something like the following ?
[0, 1] [0, 1/3] [2/3, 1] [0, 1/9] [2/9, 1/3] [2/3, 7/9] [8/9, 1] [0, 1/27] [2/27, 1/9] [2/9, 7/27] [8/27, 1/3] [2/3, 19/27] [20/27, 7/9] [8/9, 25/27] [26/27, 1] ███████████████████████████ █████████ █████████ ███ ███ ███ ███ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █