Talk:Call a function: Difference between revisions
I think splitting is probably more appropriate.
m (→Huh?) |
(I think splitting is probably more appropriate.) |
||
Line 21:
:I don't think that we should split the task. However, we could cross reference to another task where an appropriate explanation is given. For example, if a language supports named parameters, we could say: "This language supports [[Named parameters|calling a function using named parameters]]", with a link to the appropriate explanation. [[User:Markhobley|Markhobley]] 16:31, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
:: Splitting the task is probably appropriate, just based on Donal's note. You might split it as a set of closely-related tasks, with subpages. Such as [[Call a function/something specific]]. Or you might use a category to group them. Or you might play with {{tmpl|collection}} or similar. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 01:47, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
| |||