Talk:Boids: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (adding intendation) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Should the task define specific rules the birds follow, so implementations won't be too arbitrary? --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] 18:40, 7 January 2013 (UTC) |
Should the task define specific rules the birds follow, so implementations won't be too arbitrary? --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] 18:40, 7 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
:: There are several variants of the three rules of boids movements, but the original ones should be enough for this task. -[[User:Bearophile|bearophile]] 23:29, 7 January 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Yep. We really do need something concrete to implement rather than a vague link to a Wikipedia article that does not seem to have any pseudo-code to follow. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 19:58, 7 January 2013 (UTC) |
:Yep. We really do need something concrete to implement rather than a vague link to a Wikipedia article that does not seem to have any pseudo-code to follow. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 19:58, 7 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
:: I agree the Task specification is incomplete and needs improvements. (I think a Boids task is good for RosettaCode because the code needed for such simulation is not too much long, and it's a kind of task not overrepresented in RC.) -[[User:Bearophile|bearophile]] 23:29, 7 January 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 23:29, 7 January 2013
Should the task define specific rules the birds follow, so implementations won't be too arbitrary? --Ledrug 18:40, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
- There are several variants of the three rules of boids movements, but the original ones should be enough for this task. -bearophile 23:29, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
- Yep. We really do need something concrete to implement rather than a vague link to a Wikipedia article that does not seem to have any pseudo-code to follow. --Paddy3118 19:58, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
- I agree the Task specification is incomplete and needs improvements. (I think a Boids task is good for RosettaCode because the code needed for such simulation is not too much long, and it's a kind of task not overrepresented in RC.) -bearophile 23:29, 7 January 2013 (UTC)