Talk:Binary strings: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Break out?) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I think this task should be broken out into smaller tasks and then put into a category. [[String concatenation]] is already a task, so it would be grouped with these tasks. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 18:04, 14 April 2009 (UTC) |
I think this task should be broken out into smaller tasks and then put into a category. [[String concatenation]] is already a task, so it would be grouped with these tasks. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 18:04, 14 April 2009 (UTC) |
||
: Maybe is a good idea... But a path similar to [[Basic image storage]] should be begun. I mean, the struct String is shared among all the tasks... so we need also a task like "provide a basic storage for a (binary) string", so that next tasks can refer to it instead of replicating the struct, or linking to where it is defined since it is needed by a specific function, e.g. see "String concatenation" for struct... --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 11:51, 15 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 11:51, 15 April 2009
Break out?
I think this task should be broken out into smaller tasks and then put into a category. String concatenation is already a task, so it would be grouped with these tasks. --Mwn3d 18:04, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- Maybe is a good idea... But a path similar to Basic image storage should be begun. I mean, the struct String is shared among all the tasks... so we need also a task like "provide a basic storage for a (binary) string", so that next tasks can refer to it instead of replicating the struct, or linking to where it is defined since it is needed by a specific function, e.g. see "String concatenation" for struct... --ShinTakezou 11:51, 15 April 2009 (UTC)