Talk:Balanced brackets: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
m (moved Talk:Balanced strings to Talk:Balanced brackets: More descriptive name, as discussed on Talk page)
Line 3: Line 3:
:I'm on board with that. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 20:22, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
:I'm on board with that. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 20:22, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
:Me too.--[[User:Tikkanz|Tikkanz]] 22:37, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
:Me too.--[[User:Tikkanz|Tikkanz]] 22:37, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
:: Seems sensible to me. Done. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 23:10, 20 February 2011 (UTC)


==Extension?==
==Extension?==

Revision as of 23:10, 20 February 2011

Name change?

I propose this be changed to "Balanced brackets" to make it more descriptive. --Paddy3118 18:13, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

I'm on board with that. --Mwn3d 20:22, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Me too.--Tikkanz 22:37, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Seems sensible to me. Done. –Donal Fellows 23:10, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Extension?

Currently the task specifies that the strings to be tested will all have the same number of opening as closing brackets. Would it be worthwhile to generalize the problem to also include strings with uneven numbers of opening and closing brackets?--Tikkanz 22:37, 20 February 2011 (UTC)