Talk:Babbage problem: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 01:20, 13 April 2016

task clarification

I can only assume that a positive integer is meant to be found, otherwise finding the smallest negative integer would be pointless.

How about:

-99,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,025,264

(Of course, there are smaller numbers!)

And, in the hinterlands of the Rosetta Code coders, it was heard:

Oh yeah? my googolplex thingy is bigger than your googolplex thingy. So there!

-- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 01:17, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
-And, in the hinterlands of the Rosetta Code coders, it was heard: &nbsp; Oh yeah? &nbsp; ''my'' &nbsp; googolplex thingy is bigger than &nbsp; ''your'' &nbsp; googolplex thingy. &nbsp; So there!
+And, in the hinterlands of the Rosetta Code coders, it was heard:
+<big>Oh yeah? &nbsp; ''my'' &nbsp; googolplex thingy is bigger than &nbsp; ''your'' &nbsp; googolplex thingy. &nbsp; So there!<big>
 -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 01:17, 13 April 2016 (UTC)