Talk:Babbage problem: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(added a talk page.) |
m (→task clarification: added an "of course ...".) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
-99,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,025,264 |
-99,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,025,264 |
||
(Of course, there are smaller numbers!) |
|||
Revision as of 01:19, 13 April 2016
task clarification
I can only assume that a positive integer is meant to be found, otherwise finding the smallest negative integer would be pointless.
How about:
-99,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,025,264
(Of course, there are smaller numbers!)
And, in the hinterlands of the Rosetta Code coders, it was heard: Oh yeah? my googolplex thingy is bigger than your googolplex thingy. So there!
-- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 01:17, 13 April 2016 (UTC)